2026-06-19 Status Reconciliation¶
This document records the governance reconciliation performed across the README, ROADMAP, CHANGELOG, and audit docs.
Baseline¶
- Current package/release baseline:
0.2.2. - Next stabilization milestone:
M0 / v0.2.3 - Verification Gate Stabilization. - The project is pre-1.0 and must not claim fabrication-ready, production-ready, manufacturer-approved, or no-review autonomy.
Reconciled Documents¶
| File | Reconciled Item |
|---|---|
README.md |
Feature matrix distinguishes implemented foundations from experimental evidence and planned gates. Roadmap references M0/M1/M2/M3. |
docs/ROADMAP.md |
Replaced generic v0.3/v0.4 future roadmap with issue-backed M0/M1/M2/M3 roadmap and exit criteria. |
docs/FAQ.md |
Updated alpha baseline from v0.2.1 to v0.2.2. |
docs/strategy/current-state-audit.md |
Updated refresh date, version, DFM/proof-pack/plugin status, testing gaps, and 2026-06-19 reconciliation notes. |
CHANGELOG.md |
Added Unreleased governance/release-readiness section. |
Status Rules¶
Use these status meanings consistently in docs, issues, and releases:
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Implemented foundation | Code or workflow exists and is covered by at least basic tests, but may not yet be release-blocking or externally validated. |
| Experimental | Available for review and internal use; format, API, or evidence semantics may change. |
| Release-blocking | Required for a release gate; failure or non-approved skip blocks release. |
| Evidence | A generated artifact showing what was checked. Evidence is not a guarantee of correctness. |
| Human-reviewed | Output may be used only after qualified engineering review. |
Closed-Issue Audit Policy¶
Closed issues can stay closed when the original implementation exists, but they must not imply stronger claims than the current evidence supports.
| Historical issue class | Policy |
|---|---|
| Core implementation closed issues | Keep closed, label status:validated when covered by tests or release notes. |
| Proof/manufacturing/benchmark closed issues | Keep closed but attach status:needs-audit until release-gate evidence confirms the stronger claim. |
| SPICE or advanced analysis closed issues | Keep closed only if the implemented scope is clearly documented; otherwise open a follow-up issue. |
Product Positioning Guardrail¶
Preferred sentence:
Agent generates design candidates, ZapTrace records verification evidence, and a human engineer approves fabrication decisions.
Avoid:
- "fully autonomous production signoff"
- implicit fabrication readiness claims
- "manufacturer approved"
- "no human review required"